For over two hundred years, the American education system was based on the right of all citizens to education. Throughout this guiding principle, America has led the world to expanding the opportunities for training women, oppressed minorities and the general population. As the world came to American philosophy, America abandons this basic belief and dividing education into the rich, who can afford education and the rest of the country that cannot afford it.
For several decades, American education was retreating in the technical fields of science and technology. To eliminate these shortcomings, there appeared technical secondary schools and colleges on profits. They encouraged students who were not inclined to continue additional education to enter technical areas and receive higher education. Suddenly, students who did not become involved in the learning process participated. Students who could not take exams, unexpectedly did A & B on vocational courses and in commercial organizations.
Today, these two areas of education constitute an increasing number of successful students actively participating in higher education. Vocational schools and non-profit colleges are designed to encourage students to participate in technical careers and are often structured without training in the humanities that associate traditional degrees. There was a long-standing disaggregation as to whether students should be directed to specific and very narrow technical educational streams or weather, all students should be forced to get a more general education, designed to transfer them to a bachelor's degree and, ultimately, to receive a diploma.
Although this disaggregation has been torn off over several generations, the influence of training and technical institutions in terms of profit cannot be denied. They have successfully successfully promoted a large segment of the population to a technical career. However, in recent months, the education department has begun to worry about the success of schools, because they cannot guarantee that their graduates will be able to comply with the income principles created to show the success of American education dollars spent on these programs. Vocational schools and secondary education are declining throughout the country in response to the economic downturn and our society at present, and this policy of the education department. The federal government is reducing federal funding for voluntary training and technical education, rather than addressing the more complex problem of how we can integrate traditional and technical education into a single educational system.
At a time when the administration and business community recognize the need to strengthen adherence to technical education throughout the country, we reduce the ability of students to get educational loans needed to pay for education, because we have fundamental differences, because wherever there should be more general education English, in literature and art, and less focused on a narrow technical field. This, apparently, is an argument without merit, since both have a single goal - to teach the American public to be competitive in the market of tomorrow. It is at the same time that recent research has shown that the effect of college education benefits all students, whether they are in their field, in general education or in a narrow technical field. Instead of building on this promise to encourage students across the country to pursue higher education, we focused on students' ability to repay loans to banks as a single determining factor as to whether education is useful. The standard put forward by the education department does just that.
He focuses his efforts on allowing students to earn enough money to pay off loans, instead of focusing on why spending on education grows so dramatically. Their focus is on students paying banks. Because enterprises make the argument that they need to import more foreign workers to meet the growing technical demand for the high-tech industry, we are pushing American students out of the education system, because we claim that their ability to pay the bank is the only factor determining the quality of their education. It would not be so absurd if it were not for the other movement that is happening today in schools across the country.
For people who have money, there is a growing need for private pre-school institutions, which make a profit in nature to prepare their children for prestigious schools, which every year choose only talented American students. This profit model for primary and secondary schools is becoming as popular in the United States as abroad in countries such as Europe and Asia. Wealth parents quickly transfer up to $ 40,000 a year so that their children are placed in preparatory schools that will prepare them for prestigious colleges. Currently, a number of private investors are investing up to $ 200,000,000 to finance these activities for non-profit organizations. It is a growth industry that will find a growing market in this country and abroad, as the division between the haves and the have-nots in education continues to expand.
These parents have little faith in the public education system in this country. They invest their money, and their children in the hands of non-profit organizations, which, in their opinion, will make them more able to compete in the high-tech world of tomorrow. Since Madison Avenue in the American banking system is finding a new profitable market, they will use it as fully and completely as they have the traditional American education system, to the detriment of a larger society. Education in this country is becoming an instrument of banks and the rich, not of what was foreseen by the founding fathers or the many men and women who helped create this country for many generations. It no longer serves public needs and only looks at the needs of the rich, and financial institutions that motivate profits are the only driving force for their existence.
While the rest of the world is adopting the American model of an educational system that is the envy of the whole world, we are abandoning this system to a move towards one who cannot serve the nation or society. If we continue this path, our nation will look forever at the educational systems of other countries to provide technological expertise and innovative thinking that will move the world and society forward. In one breath, the education department of our nation tells us that non-profit organizations do not work, and we should consider with suspicious exceptions at any college level of these institutions, while this same model is being introduced in classrooms and in elementary schools throughout the country because the need for a better education system to meet tomorrow’s standards is increasing. However, this growing need excludes a significant part of American society. If we follow this path, then only the rich will receive education in this country.
